orchid pix
- sherrymitchell
- Posts: 226
- Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2003 3:12 am
- Location: Northern Virginia
- DelawareJim
- Posts: 1249
- Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 4:25 pm
- Real Name: Jim Michaels
- Location: Southeast PA
You will really like that lens. You can get away with a bit more when its handheld.
Michael Hill
Proud Member of the
Capital Cichlid Association
American Cichlid Association
Aquatic-Photography Forum
Proud Member of the
Capital Cichlid Association
American Cichlid Association
Aquatic-Photography Forum
- Ghazanfar Ghori
- Site Admin
- Posts: 3258
- Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2003 5:26 am
- Location: United States
- Ghazanfar Ghori
- Site Admin
- Posts: 3258
- Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2003 5:26 am
- Location: United States
I have tele-converters, extension tubes, reversing ring, bellows......somewhere in there you can get 2:1 probably somewhere in the neighborhood of 11:1 with the right lens and a mathematics degree.
Michael Hill
Proud Member of the
Capital Cichlid Association
American Cichlid Association
Aquatic-Photography Forum
Proud Member of the
Capital Cichlid Association
American Cichlid Association
Aquatic-Photography Forum
- DelawareJim
- Posts: 1249
- Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 4:25 pm
- Real Name: Jim Michaels
- Location: Southeast PA
- Ghazanfar Ghori
- Site Admin
- Posts: 3258
- Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2003 5:26 am
- Location: United States
With bellows its possible to get even higher - 20:1 - but you loose allDelawareJim wrote:11:1 Holy crap! I can see it now. Ghazanfar's new avatar is going to be a close up of the pupil of a shrimp's eye or the rings in it's antennae!
Cheers.
Jim
auto functionality and you're taking pictures in the dark so to say.
The real problem is that DOF is about as thick as a piece of paper.
Michael Hill
Proud Member of the
Capital Cichlid Association
American Cichlid Association
Aquatic-Photography Forum
Proud Member of the
Capital Cichlid Association
American Cichlid Association
Aquatic-Photography Forum