Aquarium dimensions and aquascaping

Discuss specific plants, general plant care, help setting up a plant tank, rare plants, and general help
Post Reply
User avatar
chris_todd
Posts: 1118
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 11:05 pm
Location: Catonsville

Aquarium dimensions and aquascaping

Post by chris_todd »

I'm seriously tempted to bid on either the 120g or 135g tanks being auctioned by PVAS, as we have one spot in our basement that is a little over 6 feet wide and two feet deep, and doesn't have a tank in it! :D (Ssssh... don't tell Amy I said that)

I wanted people's opinions on the relative advantages/disadvantages of these two tank's dimensions from an aquascaping perspective:
120g - four feet long by two feet wide (front to back) by two feet high
135g - six feet long by 18 inches wide by two feet high

I can imagine the extra six inches front to back might make it easier to give a sense of depth with the 120g, but I'm really tempted by the extra two feet of length the 135 provides.

Your thoughts and opinions appreciated...
User avatar
krisw
Site Admin
Posts: 7100
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 3:25 pm
Real Name: Kris Weinhold

Post by krisw »

Go for the 120g, not only is the depth incredible, it's easier to light with standard 48" T5 fixtures. (A 120g is the tank I dream about having someday)
User avatar
Aaron
Posts: 3647
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 11:18 pm
Location: Woodstock, MD

Post by Aaron »

I agree the 120 is the way to go. In general tanks that are at least 1/3 wide and tall as they are long are easier to scape.
User avatar
DonkeyFish
Posts: 1783
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 4:42 pm
Real Name: Jen Williams
Location: Alexandria, VA
Contact:

Post by DonkeyFish »

FWIW, I helped move all the tanks up in this silent auction thing... they were all gorgeous. AND will come with lights :)

Other than that, I'm with everyone else on the 120 vote. You won't miss the extra 2' when you've got a depth you can work with. :)
It is not murder if you're killing snails.
Post Reply

Sponsors