CO2 or Excel for 5 gallon?

Discuss specific plants, general plant care, help setting up a plant tank, rare plants, and general help
Post Reply
Rick Dotson
Posts: 406
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2003 3:43 am
Location: United States

CO2 or Excel for 5 gallon?

Post by Rick Dotson »

I was wondering if anyone has compared CO2 injection with Seachem Excel for growth results in a small tank, like say a 5 gallon. This is Mary tank and she is dosing both currently and she has plants that I almost killed are coming back pretty nice.

So maybe a poll for Excel or CO2?

Rick
User avatar
Aaron
Posts: 3647
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 11:18 pm
Location: Woodstock, MD

Post by Aaron »

CO2 all the way if you have to choose. I dose both a lot of times though.
JMLenke
Posts: 1007
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 7:39 pm

Post by JMLenke »

do Co2 it is more reliable and isnt affected by you leaving for a few days or something.
The other Jeff

Master of growing algae and getting better at plants
User avatar
krisw
Site Admin
Posts: 7100
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 3:25 pm
Real Name: Kris Weinhold

Post by krisw »

Some people claim that HC benefits from Excel in addition to CO2. I believe it's similar to the KNO3 vs ammonium debate for nitrogen, that some plants prefer one source or another.

I usually only dose Excel on my CO2 tanks if my water level's too low, and the powerhead is blowing across the surface, and I'm too busy to top it off that day, or if there's unwanted algae in the tank.
User avatar
RTRJR
Posts: 558
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2003 6:23 am
Location: MD exurbs

Post by RTRJR »

If you are splitting off from a a pressurized system, I'd say CO2. It has been a long time, but I had great difficulty controlling DIY fermentations in small tanks - too much boom and bust. I'd just go Excel rather than widely fluctuating dosage of CO2.
Where's the fish? Neptune
User avatar
SCMurphy
Site Admin
Posts: 2104
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2003 1:40 pm
Real Name: Sean
Location: Maryland United States

Post by SCMurphy »

Robert makes a great point, but it holds true for both CO2 and Excel. You need to avoid wild fluctuations with both. Pressurized CO2 is the easiest to keep stable. Excel works, but you can't let up the dosing for more than 3 or so days if you are being consistent about it. Being consistently inconsistent will also cause you a problem with Excel just like DIY CO2. You are almost better running without CO2 then having a disruptive schedule.
"したくさ" Sean

Aquascape? I'm a crypt farmer.

If you've got bait, I've got wasabi!

I wish I could be like Mr. Sarcastic when I grow up! ;)
User avatar
RTRJR
Posts: 558
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2003 6:23 am
Location: MD exurbs

Post by RTRJR »

What Sean is being too polite to say outright is that erratic Excel dosing or erratic CO2 levels are great algae promotion techniques...and do nothing positive for plants.
Where's the fish? Neptune
Rick Dotson
Posts: 406
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2003 3:43 am
Location: United States

Post by Rick Dotson »

Thanks for the insight. I have not really used Excel and wanted to know if it was as good as CO2. Sounds like, just stick with the CO2.

Rick
User avatar
Judi
Posts: 812
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2007 9:48 pm
Real Name: Judi Hammett
Location: Catonsville, Maryland

Post by Judi »

With my 2.5 gallon, I did both co2 and Excel for quite some time.

I began with Excel, and switched to diy co2 when I was going to be out of town for a few days. I later started adding Excel in addition to the co2 to help with an algae problem, and continued doing both Excel and co2 long after the algae was eliminated because I liked the results. The downoi and HC in particular just seemed to go insane.

Within the past couple weeks or so, I decided to slowly eliminate the Excel, and see how it goes. So far, so good.
Post Reply

Sponsors